The issue of overcrowding prisons in the united states

Lucky for us, the Prison Policy Initiative has released a comprehensive graphic that aggregates the available information and helps to explain the complicated and expansive U. Of course, not all of those people stay in prison. Annually,people are released from state and federal prisons back into society. The rest are being held for minor offenses with sentences under a year.

The issue of overcrowding prisons in the united states

Modern Americans would surely consider such a place barbaric and cruel. Yet in the s and s, California essentially meted out such punishments, knowingly shoveling unprecedented numbers of convicts into overcrowded, under-equipped prisons to serve long, hopeless sentences.

Prison Reform and Alternatives to Imprisonment

In"a preventable or possibly preventable death occurred" somewhere in California's prison system "once every five to six days," the U. Supreme Court observed in the case of Brown v.

It's hard to find medical staff even for functional prisons; vacancies in the California system ranged from 20 percent for doctors to 44 percent for X-ray technicians. But an excess of inmates, more than a lack of doctors, caused the state's prison health care crisis.

Built to house roughly 80, people, California's prisons were stuffed with twice that many residents, prompting Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to declare a state of emergency. With every cell full, prison officials had packed gymnasiums with double and triple bunks.

In one such makeshift dormitory, a prisoner was beaten to death. No one on the prison staff noticed for several hours. California conceded that such conditions violated the Eighth Amendment, but the state fought long and hard with prisoners' rights lawyers over how to remedy the violations.

In Plata, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower federal court order requiring California to reduce prison overcrowding to In subsequent litigation, the deadline was extended to At the time, the required reduction amounted to about 40, prisoners, assuming no increase in capacity—which, given the state's fiscal situation, was a realistic assumption.

The order didn't literally require the authorities to award 40, inmates a surprise trip home. California was free to decide how to thin its prison rolls: It could transfer state prisoners to local jails, stop sending parolees to prison for minor violations an anomalous California practice that had been a major contributor to overcrowdingadjust its sentencing laws prospectively, or use some mix of approaches.

Still, because the order set a limit on a prison population, it qualified as a "prisoner release order" under the Prison Litigation Reform Act ofwhich permits courts to issue such orders only as a last resort.

Over 10 days of hearings before the Plata trial court, past and present prison wardens from around the country had testified that California's prisons could safely be downsized. Doyle Wayne Scott, a former head of the Texas prison system, pronounced California's prisons "appalling," "inhumane" and "unacceptable," stating that he had "never seen anything like it" in his year career.

Many analysts have described the Supreme Court's decision using outdated tropes from the Warren court era, portraying the judges as activists either nobly or naively interfering with law enforcement.

Such interpretations are too simplistic, as Berkeley law professor Jonathan Simon makes clear in Mass Incarceration on Trial, a book that chronicles the decades of complex litigation that culminated in Plata. The Supreme Court usually defers to states on issues of punishment. Even on its so-called liberal wing, the current court contains no public opponent of the death penalty.

And the Prison Litigation Reform Act limits judges from intervening in prison administration even if they want to. That a relatively conservative and congressionally handcuffed court was moved to uphold the Plata release order says less about the justices than it does about how egregious the California prisons had become by But that fact reflects a historic transformation from California's position, until the late s, as one of the least punitive states.

Search form An individual adjudged guilty of a capital felony in a case in which the state does not seek the death penalty shall be punished by imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for: In death penalty cases, prospective jurors will be told that a sentence of life imprisonment without parole or death is mandatory on conviction of a capital felony.

Every state got "tough on crime" in the s and '90s, but no state swung from one policy extreme to the other quite like California, which famously enacted the nation's most draconian Three Strikes Law, among other reforms. As Simon notes, California's incarceration rate demonstrated the highest increase in the nation, growing "a staggering percent between and By the time Plata reached the Supreme Court, one of the underlying lawsuits had been ongoing since At oral argument, some of the justices expressed palpable frustration.

Two of the appended pictures show gymnasiums filled with beds, prisoners standing around in the narrow corridors between them.

The third picture shows two cages the size of telephone booths. California locked suicidal prisoners inside such cages when there were no available beds in mental health facilities. Kennedy's opinion referenced a prisoner who was "held in such a cage for nearly 24 hours, standing in a pool of his own urine, unresponsive and nearly catatonic.

Still, Simon rejects the notion that Plata was a one-off, "a remarkable but unique judicial intervention—the Bush v. Gore of prison jurisprudence. But he goes one step further: The California example proves, he argues, that imprisoning massive numbers of people fundamentally cannot comport with the Eighth Amendment.Video: Major Problems, Issues & Trends Facing Prisons Today.

The issue of overcrowding prisons in the united states

Prison Overcrowding. The United States has the world's largest prison population, with nearly million people currently living.

Why promote prison reform? Central to the arguments to promote prison reforms is a human rights argument - the premise on which many UN standards and norms have been developed.

Tags: Criminal Justice, Overcriminalization, prison overcrowding, public safety In Depth: Criminal Justice The American Legislative Exchange Council is proud to be a leader on criminal justice in the states.

A jail cell on death row, where prison inmates await execution, is seen at the state penitentiary in Huntsville, Texas September 29, Jenevieve Robbins/Texas Dept of Criminal Justice/Handout.

As Simon notes, California's incarceration rate demonstrated the highest increase in the nation, growing "a staggering percent between and " Moreover, an average incarceration rate for the United States—for that matter, a low incarceration rate for the United States—remains extremely high by world standards.

Using the latest Census Bureau data from and , this paper provides a detailed picture of the more than 50 million immigrants (legal and illegal) and their U.S.-born children (under 18) in the United States by country of birth, state, and legal status.

Immigrants in the United States, | Center for Immigration Studies